AITA for making my kids salute the flag and call me “sir” after their mom turned them vegan?

Welcome back, AITA aficionados! Today we’re diving into a custody clash that’s sure to spark fierce debate. Co-parenting is rarely easy, but when personal values and parenting styles collide head-on, the results can be truly explosive. This story pits a dad’s traditional values against his ex-wife’s lifestyle choices, all through the lens of their children.
Our OP, a father, found himself at a crossroads after his children’s mother made a significant change to their diet. What started as a difference in food choices quickly escalated into a battle for control, leading to some rather unconventional disciplinary measures. Get ready to weigh in on whether his methods were justified or if he overstepped a boundary.
“AITA for making my kids salute the flag and call me “sir” after their mom turned them vegan?”




This situation clearly illustrates the pitfalls of co-parenting when communication breaks down and respect for each other’s parenting decisions dwindles. The initial issue, the children’s diet, is a significant one that ideally should have been a joint decision. For one parent to unilaterally impose a fundamental change like a strict vegan diet on shared children, especially without the other’s consent or thorough discussion, can understandably feel like an overreach.
From the father’s perspective, his ex-wife’s decision could be perceived as a direct challenge to his parental authority and an attempt to indoctrinate the children into her personal beliefs. His response, while extreme, seems to stem from a feeling of powerlessness and a desire to reassert his influence. He views his actions as a necessary counterbalance to what he sees as her “radical” influence.
However, the father’s chosen methods—making the children salute the flag and call him “sir”—are highly reactive and potentially detrimental. These actions are less about the children’s well-being and more about a power struggle between the ex-spouses. Such rules, especially when introduced out of spite or retaliation, can create an unsettling and confusing environment for the children, forcing them to navigate a tense parental conflict.
The children’s welfare should be paramount in any co-parenting decision. Being caught in the middle of a parental war, where each parent attempts to counteract the other’s influence through increasingly rigid rules, can be emotionally damaging. Both parents have a responsibility to foster a stable and nurturing environment, and this situation appears to be doing the opposite, using the children as pawns in their unresolved marital conflict.
The Verdict Is In: Traditional Dad vs. Vegan Mom — Who’s the Real AITA?
The comments section exploded, as expected, with a strong divide mirroring the conflict itself. Many users sided with the father, feeling that the ex-wife was indeed overstepping by unilaterally changing the kids’ diet. They argued that his actions, while perhaps extreme, were a justified reaction to her “my way or the highway” approach, especially regarding significant health and lifestyle choices for shared children.
Conversely, a substantial number of commenters condemned the father’s actions as petty and manipulative, arguing he was using the children to punish his ex-wife. They highlighted that forcing kids to salute flags and use formal address out of spite is not healthy parenting and could create resentment. The consensus leaned towards both parents being at fault for involving the children in their personal war.





This AITA case truly highlights the complexities of co-parenting, especially when personal beliefs clash dramatically. While the initial grievance about the children’s diet is valid, the father’s reaction introduced an entirely new layer of conflict, turning a disagreement into a power play. Ultimately, the children are caught in the middle, and their emotional well-being should be the primary concern. Open communication, compromise, or even mediation might be better avenues than retaliatory parenting tactics, regardless of who you believe is the initial “asshole.”