AITA for telling my wife I want a post-nup that she pays me $200k if she ever goes above a size 6 again?

Oh boy, do we have a doozy for you today! Get ready to gasp because this AITA submission takes marital expectations to a whole new, deeply uncomfortable level. We often hear about pre-nups and the sometimes-sticky financial conversations before marriage, but what happens when those conversations resurface after the 'I do's, with a shockingly specific and frankly, quite conditional twist?

This story dives headfirst into body image, control, and what it truly means to love and respect your partner unconditionally. Our original poster, 'ThrowawayHusband420', has truly thrown a wrench into the traditional understanding of marital agreements, sparking a fierce debate that has the internet collectively clutching its pearls. Let's unpack this one, shall we?

"AITA for telling my wife I want a post-nup that she pays me $200k if she ever goes above a size 6 again?"

The original poster's request for a post-nuptial agreement tied to his wife's clothing size and a significant financial penalty is, frankly, deeply problematic. Marriage is fundamentally built on trust, respect, and unconditional love. Introducing a clause that essentially penalizes a spouse for natural bodily changes, or even just for not conforming to a very specific aesthetic standard, directly undermines these core tenets.

From a relationship health perspective, this demand signals a concerning level of control and objectification. It suggests that the poster's love and commitment are conditional on his wife's physical appearance, rather than on her character, partnership, or overall well-being. This kind of ultimatum can be incredibly damaging to a person's self-esteem and can foster resentment, anxiety, and a feeling of being constantly judged and inadequate within their own home.

Furthermore, the financial component of $200,000 adds an element of severe coercion. This isn't a playful incentive; it's a punitive measure designed to exert immense pressure. It transforms a deeply personal aspect of someone's life into a transactional obligation, completely stripping away any notion of mutual support or understanding during life's inevitable changes.

While the poster claims concern for his wife's 'health' and 'the spark,' his chosen method is more likely to extinguish any spark and severely damage her mental and emotional health. Genuine concern for a partner's well-being is expressed through open communication, mutual support, and encouragement, not through financial threats or contractual body shaming. This is a severe breach of marital trust.

The Internet Weighs In: Is a Size 6 Demand a Dealbreaker?

As expected, the internet has come down HARD on 'ThrowawayHusband420'. The overwhelming sentiment is a resounding YTA (You're The Asshole), with many users expressing shock, disgust, and profound sympathy for his wife. Commenters highlighted the controlling nature of the demand, the blatant objectification, and the incredibly damaging impact such an agreement would have on a partner's self-worth and mental health.

Many pointed out that bodies change naturally over time, and tying financial security to an arbitrary clothing size is not only unrealistic but cruel. The financial penalty was seen by most as a manipulative tactic rather than a genuine expression of love or concern. The consensus strongly suggests that this kind of demand is a major red flag and potentially indicative of emotional abuse.

This AITA post serves as a stark reminder that true partnership extends far beyond physical appearance. A healthy marriage thrives on mutual respect, open communication, and unconditional acceptance, especially as life brings changes. Demanding a post-nup based on a clothing size and backed by a hefty financial penalty is not only a profound breach of trust but also deeply emotionally damaging. It's a critical moment for the original poster to reflect on his values and what he truly seeks in a lifelong companion, because this approach will only lead to resentment and a shattered relationship.